Skip to main content

Daylight savings time

Well, we sprang forward again to enjoy the benefits of a longer daylight afternoon. I don't mind Ben Franklin's conceit all that much, it's the execution I find flawed.

First, two arbitrary, early Sunday morning dates are chosen by those in charge for the translation of temporal axes. Few people change their clocks at 2:00 AM, and the surprise the next morning is punctuated by "What time is it?" or groans from revisionistic sleep.

[Congress in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 established that in 2009, daylight time begins on March 8 and ends on November 1]

I wear an "atomic" wristwatch synchronized to standard time in Colorado. My watch really isn't atomic, but it is radio linked to the time given by the cesium fountain atomic clock in Boulder. Several clocks in my house have the same feature. My computers get corrected time on-line. I like the automatic adjustment feature. When I wake up Sunday morning in March, the only surprise for me is the misleading feeling that I must have overslept because my automatically adjusted watch indicates a later time.

There is, of course, the system shock from  translating an hour up or down on the new schedule, and the social discomfort of listening to everyone bitch about "why don't they stick to one time and quit the changes?" Well, atomic clocks gave me an inspiration. If a signal can automatically adjust my watch twice a year to the politically mandated time, why couldn't it do it every day?

Now this isn't an idle thought, power companies can adjust their 60 hertz power generation frequency and your home electric clock will adjust its speed in response. Many watch owners adjust their mechanical timekeepers weekly, sometimes daily to correspond to radio or workplace time. Of course there are a large number of relatively accurate, digital or mechanical watches that keep reasonable time without automatic reference to these standards. These timepieces will be obsoleted by my plan

What we need are two standards: accurate time for precision work and continuous daylight saving time (CDST) for everyday, commercial living for the rest of us. 

Here's my proposal for (pseudo) continuous daylight savings time. Beginning with the winter solstice, add 30 seconds to the official (accurate)  government broadcast time at midnight accumulating to the CDST for each night. By the time we reach summer solstice, the accumulated adjustment would have launched our clocks forward approximately 1 and 1/2 additional hours. With summer solstice, reverse the process and subtract 30 seconds from the official government time every night at midnight to the CDST.  

There it is. No trauma. No gnashing of teeth. Only an imperceptable, easing to longer daylight time in the summer and corresponding painless return to standard time for the short-day wnter months.

Oh sure, the nay-sayers will point out the problems. Many people will have to buy new watches. Could be. Call that my contribution to economic stimulus. On the third hand, I lived for years with cheap watches that I adjusted every few days to approximate correct time.  Don't expect me to be sympathetic if your Rolex is off time a few minutes each week.

We don't have the political will, you say. Well even the people I know who like daylight savings time wish that we could just save daylight all year long.  If it is good to have light at the end of the day in summer when there is lots of light, how much more important is it to have daylight at the end of the day in the winter when it is really needed? When did we vote to make it the way it is? Do you trust politicians to take care of your taxes, the economy, defense, law and order, infrastructure, and education, but you won't give them the time of day?

Hmm... Well on third thought, maybe there are some flaws in my plan that need to be resolved.

***

Speaking of politics, I've been thinking about the Senator Greeg for Secretary of Commerce fiasco, particularly in relation to who should be in charge of the census. As I see the problem, we are trying create geographical boundaries to partition transient voters into favourable voting groups. In this digital age that makes little sense, particularly because the artificial boundaries disenfranchise the "losing side" in the next election. 

More On the Third Hand views on elections using geographic boundaries to limit people next time.





Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Judicial Philosophy, Part 1

  Preamble Sitting members and nominees to the Supreme Court often identify themselves by a particular judicial philosophy concerning their interpretation of the Constitution or have some such label applied to them by observers. One purpose of labels is to serve as a code word to simplify the general approach that judge will use when applying the Constitution. Another use is to obscure intent, particularly when it allows the judge and her supporters to avoid answering difficult questions during the nomination process. With the enablement of the party controlling the Senate, such avoidance is practiced by nominees from both Democratic and Republican presidents. In my opinion, these labels serve little practical purpose except to alert a political base, nevertheless I will list six judicial philosophies, a perfect number that pleases me, for discussion. What are the most common of these judicial labels, and what philosophies and opposition do they suggest? First a disclaimer, (cavea
Post a Comment
Read more

Getting started

ayo - loose and flying away, describing a kite when the string is cut and it flies away. masala - gossipy embellishments in repeating a story.   You can imagine the tiny snap, followed by a sorrowful gasp as the kite's string breaks: Adios ayo.  On second thought, you can imagine the horrific thud to chop the kite line, followed by a scream of agony at the loss. For a quite a few years, breaking into book fiction has been difficult. As publishers, with rare exception, refused to accept unsolicited manuscripts, authors were forced to find an agent to represent them. The publisher had a buyers market: more good submissions than they could wade through. Of course, there was an even larger supply of illiterates who were writing the great American novel, and so the cost of sifting through submissions became very expensive. By shifting the burden to agents, the publisher achieved a way to control the avalanche of manuscripts, particularly those that were less than good, and  some of th
Post a Comment
Read more

A Modern Parable based on a Very Old Joke.

John talks to Clem about skydiving. Clem is hesitant because jumping out of plane just for the sake of falling doesn't make a lot of sense, but John insists that such a stunt will make a big difference in Clem's life. Clem says, "You wouldn't lie to me would you, John."  John says, "No way. I guarantee your life will be better, and jumping will be the greatest experience of your life. And better yet, all those people who made fun of you over the years will look at you in awe and Tweet 'OMG, he jumped out of a plane. LOL." So Clem says, "Well, maybe ... How does it work?" "First," John says, "we go up in a plane--" "What kind of plane?" "Why the very best of planes. Big luxurious seats. Drinks served. It will be the greatest experience of your life. Then the instructor will give you a parachute--" "What kind of parachute?" Clem asks. "The very best kind of parachute.
Post a Comment
Read more