Skip to main content

Getting started

ayo - loose and flying away, describing a kite when the string is cut and it flies away.
masala - gossipy embellishments in repeating a story.  

You can imagine the tiny snap, followed by a sorrowful gasp as the kite's string breaks: Adios ayo. 

On second thought, you can imagine the horrific thud to chop the kite line, followed by a scream of agony at the loss.

For a quite a few years, breaking into book fiction has been difficult. As publishers, with rare exception, refused to accept unsolicited manuscripts, authors were forced to find an agent to represent them. The publisher had a buyers market: more good submissions than they could wade through. Of course, there was an even larger supply of illiterates who were writing the great American novel, and so the cost of sifting through submissions became very expensive. By shifting the burden to agents, the publisher achieved a way to control the avalanche of manuscripts, particularly those that were less than good, and some of the sifting cost of was shifted to authors and agents.

Nonfiction books are not quite as restricted. In particular, publishers have often haunted the halls of Academia in search of textbooks. The reasons for this are reasonably obvious given the price of textbooks, the captive audience, and likelihood that an author will have his textbook adopted at his home institution. However, even that appears to be tightening. Most consolidated textbook publishers no longer list the names of acquisition editors for the individual disciplines. In essence, the publisher's book representative has become the intermediary between the publisher and the academic. With the economic downturn, access appears to be even more restrictive.

If the non-fiction book is not a textbook, but is a book of general interest, the market still appears to be resonably open.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Judicial Philosophy, Part 1

  Preamble Sitting members and nominees to the Supreme Court often identify themselves by a particular judicial philosophy concerning their interpretation of the Constitution or have some such label applied to them by observers. One purpose of labels is to serve as a code word to simplify the general approach that judge will use when applying the Constitution. Another use is to obscure intent, particularly when it allows the judge and her supporters to avoid answering difficult questions during the nomination process. With the enablement of the party controlling the Senate, such avoidance is practiced by nominees from both Democratic and Republican presidents. In my opinion, these labels serve little practical purpose except to alert a political base, nevertheless I will list six judicial philosophies, a perfect number that pleases me, for discussion. What are the most common of these judicial labels, and what philosophies and opposition do they suggest? First a disclaimer, (cavea

A Modern Parable based on a Very Old Joke.

John talks to Clem about skydiving. Clem is hesitant because jumping out of plane just for the sake of falling doesn't make a lot of sense, but John insists that such a stunt will make a big difference in Clem's life. Clem says, "You wouldn't lie to me would you, John."  John says, "No way. I guarantee your life will be better, and jumping will be the greatest experience of your life. And better yet, all those people who made fun of you over the years will look at you in awe and Tweet 'OMG, he jumped out of a plane. LOL." So Clem says, "Well, maybe ... How does it work?" "First," John says, "we go up in a plane--" "What kind of plane?" "Why the very best of planes. Big luxurious seats. Drinks served. It will be the greatest experience of your life. Then the instructor will give you a parachute--" "What kind of parachute?" Clem asks. "The very best kind of parachute.