Skip to main content

Things I Don't Understand


    Some uses for Classifications, Definitions, Refining definitions, and Re-purposing words.

On the one hand:

  1. Why do we drive on a parkway, and park on a driveway?
  2. Shouldn't hot water heaters be called cold water heaters? If the water is already hot, why heat it?
  3. Shouldn't there be another word that sounds like the word homonym but means something different or is spelled differently?
  4. See #3. Homonym apparently isn't precise enough to distinguish all possible cases. Therefore, we refine the concept with homophones, homographs, heteronyms, heterophones, heterographs, capitonyms. . . I'm not making these word up*. Even though I have difficulty remembering the distinctions among these more precise categories , I understand that for linguists, the ability to distinguish among various types of homonyms could be useful.
  5. For example, a capitonym changes its meaning or pronunciation when capitalized. For example furniture polish is not pronounced like Polish, the language. The bird turkey becomes the country Turkey when capitalized. Use a capitonym cautiously at the beginning of a sentence. Curiously, the word capitonym does not change its meaning or pronunciation when Capitalized.
  6. Also as an example, consider heteronyms AKA heterophones. Note: Synonyms have the same meaning but different spellings. Heteronyms have the same spelling but different meanings and pronunciations. For example wind in "I tried to wind the balloon string around my finger, but the wind was to strong."
  7. Heterographs have the same pronunciation, but different meanings and spellings. For example "to", "too", and "two".
(IIRC, the #1 was pointed out to me by Gallagher, #2 by George Carlin.)
Most folks don't have need for the above terminology, but the more precise refinements to categories of homonyms are useful to linguists.*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homonym


On the other hand:


  • Agreeing on the definition of a word in context is essential to agreeing on a fact. Good definitions short circuit many semantic disputes. Axiomatic systems based on logic and precise definitions were designed by the Greek philosophers to aid in the pursuit of truth,

On the third hand:

  • Unlike philosophers, Politicians use pseudo-logic, prejudicial terminology and and misleading rhetoric in the pursuit of power. For example, in today's news, the Republicans plan to eliminate the word transgender by creating a strict binary definition of gender despite clear biological observations to the contrary. This is somewhat similar to the old political effort to re-define pi as a rational number or even repeal the law of gravity. However, the attempt to redefine will give their usual bathroom plank new life near mid-term elections when they need distractions from their plans for important issues.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tariffs Explained by the Shirt Off Your Back

Who Pays for Tariffs Explained by the Shirt Off Your Back.   Whether you are a fan of tariffs or not, it could be useful to discuss how they influence the price you pay for some simple item, like for instance, an inexpensive polo shirt. First, we need to know something about calculating retail prices. If you don’t give a damn about calculating retail prices, skip the next four paragraphs*. *Retailers usually determine the retail price of something they sell in terms of the markup , which is the amount added to their cost for the item. That markup is usually expressed as a percentage, and a common markup for items such as polo shirts is 40%. However, the base for that percentage markup should NOT be the cost of the item. Rather, it is almost always the selling price. Here’s why: *Suppose a seller’s cost for a package of underwear is $6.00 and he bases his 40% markup on his $6.00 cost. Calculating 40% of $6.00 produces 40% X $6.00 = $2.40. Add the $2.40 to $6.00: $2.40...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Modern Parable based on a Very Old Joke.

John talks to Clem about skydiving. Clem is hesitant because jumping out of plane just for the sake of falling doesn't make a lot of sense, but John insists that such a stunt will make a big difference in Clem's life. Clem says, "You wouldn't lie to me would you, John."  John says, "No way. I guarantee your life will be better, and jumping will be the greatest experience of your life. And better yet, all those people who made fun of you over the years will look at you in awe and Tweet 'OMG, he jumped out of a plane. LOL." So Clem says, "Well, maybe ... How does it work?" "First," John says, "we go up in a plane--" "What kind of plane?" "Why the very best of planes. Big luxurious seats. Drinks served. It will be the greatest experience of your life. Then the instructor will give you a parachute--" "What kind of parachute?" Clem asks. "The very best kind of parachute. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Voter Fraud: Type I & Type II Errors.

Caveat: IANAL, I am ignorant of the law, however, I know a little about statistics and testing hypotheses. On one hand: Suppose we are confronted with making a decision based on limited data; most real world data is incomplete. Consider, for example, the charge that Ted murdered Jack Our legal system doesn’t require that jurors be omniscient. It only requires that jurors begin by assuming that Ted is Innocent until Proven Guilty . In more precise language, jurors should begin with the hypothesis that Ted is not guilty  as opposed to the alternative that Ted is guilty . Jack is guilty is not a reasonable alternative hypothesis.  We do not test whether Ted is innocent versus Ted is not innocent . If the reason for this is not immediately obvious, I hope it soon will be. The jurors examine the presented evidence, and ideally without bias, evaluate the accumulation of evidence and arguments. If the accumulated arguments and evidence presented by the prosecution persuades...
Post a Comment
Read more