Skip to main content

Things I Don't Understand


    Some uses for Classifications, Definitions, Refining definitions, and Re-purposing words.

On the one hand:

  1. Why do we drive on a parkway, and park on a driveway?
  2. Shouldn't hot water heaters be called cold water heaters? If the water is already hot, why heat it?
  3. Shouldn't there be another word that sounds like the word homonym but means something different or is spelled differently?
  4. See #3. Homonym apparently isn't precise enough to distinguish all possible cases. Therefore, we refine the concept with homophones, homographs, heteronyms, heterophones, heterographs, capitonyms. . . I'm not making these word up*. Even though I have difficulty remembering the distinctions among these more precise categories , I understand that for linguists, the ability to distinguish among various types of homonyms could be useful.
  5. For example, a capitonym changes its meaning or pronunciation when capitalized. For example furniture polish is not pronounced like Polish, the language. The bird turkey becomes the country Turkey when capitalized. Use a capitonym cautiously at the beginning of a sentence. Curiously, the word capitonym does not change its meaning or pronunciation when Capitalized.
  6. Also as an example, consider heteronyms AKA heterophones. Note: Synonyms have the same meaning but different spellings. Heteronyms have the same spelling but different meanings and pronunciations. For example wind in "I tried to wind the balloon string around my finger, but the wind was to strong."
  7. Heterographs have the same pronunciation, but different meanings and spellings. For example "to", "too", and "two".
(IIRC, the #1 was pointed out to me by Gallagher, #2 by George Carlin.)
Most folks don't have need for the above terminology, but the more precise refinements to categories of homonyms are useful to linguists.*https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homonym


On the other hand:


  • Agreeing on the definition of a word in context is essential to agreeing on a fact. Good definitions short circuit many semantic disputes. Axiomatic systems based on logic and precise definitions were designed by the Greek philosophers to aid in the pursuit of truth,

On the third hand:

  • Unlike philosophers, Politicians use pseudo-logic, prejudicial terminology and and misleading rhetoric in the pursuit of power. For example, in today's news, the Republicans plan to eliminate the word transgender by creating a strict binary definition of gender despite clear biological observations to the contrary. This is somewhat similar to the old political effort to re-define pi as a rational number or even repeal the law of gravity. However, the attempt to redefine will give their usual bathroom plank new life near mid-term elections when they need distractions from their plans for important issues.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Judicial Philosophy, Part 1

  Preamble Sitting members and nominees to the Supreme Court often identify themselves by a particular judicial philosophy concerning their interpretation of the Constitution or have some such label applied to them by observers. One purpose of labels is to serve as a code word to simplify the general approach that judge will use when applying the Constitution. Another use is to obscure intent, particularly when it allows the judge and her supporters to avoid answering difficult questions during the nomination process. With the enablement of the party controlling the Senate, such avoidance is practiced by nominees from both Democratic and Republican presidents. In my opinion, these labels serve little practical purpose except to alert a political base, nevertheless I will list six judicial philosophies, a perfect number that pleases me, for discussion. What are the most common of these judicial labels, and what philosophies and opposition do they suggest? First a disclaimer, (cavea
Post a Comment
Read more

Getting started

ayo - loose and flying away, describing a kite when the string is cut and it flies away. masala - gossipy embellishments in repeating a story.   You can imagine the tiny snap, followed by a sorrowful gasp as the kite's string breaks: Adios ayo.  On second thought, you can imagine the horrific thud to chop the kite line, followed by a scream of agony at the loss. For a quite a few years, breaking into book fiction has been difficult. As publishers, with rare exception, refused to accept unsolicited manuscripts, authors were forced to find an agent to represent them. The publisher had a buyers market: more good submissions than they could wade through. Of course, there was an even larger supply of illiterates who were writing the great American novel, and so the cost of sifting through submissions became very expensive. By shifting the burden to agents, the publisher achieved a way to control the avalanche of manuscripts, particularly those that were less than good, and  some of th
Post a Comment
Read more

Wealth and Taxes.

Recently, I've read a few comments, primarily from very wealthy people, about the proposed wealth tax . I haven't decided whether this is a good idea or not, and so I did some shallow investigation beyond newspaper headlines. Most of us already have a good idea about what tax  means, but wealth is not immediately obvious. I've checked several sources on what  wealth  usually means. The most common interpretation of wealth I've encountered is that it's equivalent to Net Worth . Basically, N et Worth = assets - liabilities, where assets include the value of all your cash and things you own, and liabilities consist of your obligations and the money you owe. Hence, if you bought a house for $250,000 and the house is valued at $250,000, then you have a $250,000 asset . If you took out a $200,000 mortgage to finance your purchase of the house, then you also acquired a $200,000 liability . If you also have $5000 in your bank account, then that is an asset.  If yo
Post a Comment
Read more